Estonian CIT and company reorganisations – new protective opinion from the Head of the National Revenue Administration

Estonian CIT and company reorganisations – new protective opinion from the Head of the National Revenue Administration

On 1 August 2025, the Head of the National Revenue Administration issued a protective opinion (ref. DKP16.8082.1.2025), which is of significant importance for companies planning to switch to Estonian CIT after undergoing reorganisation. In the case in question, the authority found that the redemption and sale of shares leading to the elimination of an investment…

Substance related to assets and personnel as a key element of actual economic activity in light of the 2025 Withholding Tax Explanations

Substance related to assets and personnel as a key element of actual economic activity in light of the 2025 Withholding Tax Explanations

Asset and personnel substance is one of the most important elements in determining the status of the beneficial owner [hereinafter: ‘BO’] for the purposes of withholding tax [hereinafter: ‘WHT’]. The tax explanations published on 3 July 2025 by the Polish Ministry of Finance concerning the application of the so-called beneficial owner clause for withholding tax…

Economic power in light of the WHT Explanations – is this the end of uncertainty?

Economic power in light of the WHT Explanations – is this the end of uncertainty?

On 9 July 2025, the Minister of Finance published the long-awaited tax explanatory notes regarding so-called beneficial owner clause for withholding tax purposes (hereinafter: WHT Explanatory Notes). Their publication is of significant importance for withholding tax remitters and taxpayers who, since 2022, have been and continue to be particularly exposed to increased controls and proceedings…

The Supreme Administrative Court's ruling of 15 May 2025 (ref. II FSK 163/25) provides clarity on one of the challenging and ambiguous issues concerning Estonian CIT

The NSA has adopted a more flexible approach to the Estonian CIT, reducing the requirement for rigid formalities to 300 days of employment

The Supreme Administrative Court’s ruling of 15 May 2025 (ref. II FSK 163/25) provides clarity on one of the challenging and ambiguous issues concerning Estonian CIT. This refers to the condition of maintaining an appropriate level of employment for a minimum of 300 days in a tax year, as outlined in Article 28j(1)(3)(a) of the…