A new perspective from the CJEU on transfer pricing adjustments and VAT – the Arcomet Case (C-726/23)

A new perspective from the CJEU on transfer pricing adjustments and VAT – the Arcomet Case (C-726/23)

Continuing the TP and VAT series, in which we discuss the most important cases regarding intra-group settlements (see: Intra-group settlements under the scrutiny of the CJEU – key issues in transfer pricing and VAT), this time we are looking at the Arcomet case (C-726/23), which introduces a new perspective on a well-known topic. The issue…

Economic power in light of the WHT Explanations – is this the end of uncertainty?

Economic power in light of the WHT Explanations – is this the end of uncertainty?

On 9 July 2025, the Minister of Finance published the long-awaited tax explanatory notes regarding so-called beneficial owner clause for withholding tax purposes (hereinafter: WHT Explanatory Notes). Their publication is of significant importance for withholding tax remitters and taxpayers who, since 2022, have been and continue to be particularly exposed to increased controls and proceedings…

The Supreme Administrative Court's ruling of 15 May 2025 (ref. II FSK 163/25) provides clarity on one of the challenging and ambiguous issues concerning Estonian CIT

The NSA has adopted a more flexible approach to the Estonian CIT, reducing the requirement for rigid formalities to 300 days of employment

The Supreme Administrative Court’s ruling of 15 May 2025 (ref. II FSK 163/25) provides clarity on one of the challenging and ambiguous issues concerning Estonian CIT. This refers to the condition of maintaining an appropriate level of employment for a minimum of 300 days in a tax year, as outlined in Article 28j(1)(3)(a) of the…